*진하게 표시한 부분은 제가 파악한 문단의 주요 내용이니 참고하세요^^
The cane toad colony in Australia has been raised as a serious problem because this exotic species threats some native animals has been raised. To solve this problem, the writer asserts three possible solutions: using national fence, allowing volunteers to capture and destroy the toads, and developing a virus to control the populations. However, the lecturer counters the writer's arguments.
To begin with, the lecture claims that national fence would not be effective as we expect, because young cane toads and eggs of cane toads will still flow into the ocean by passing cracks of fences. Furthermore, fences could lead to be a matter of water pollution. In contrast to these worries, the writer insists that national fence will succeed to destroy the cane toad colony just like the early example of preventing the spread of rabbits. 울타리 설치를 해결책으로 제시하는 reading의 맥락과 그에 반대하는 lecturer의 주장이 잘 정리되어 있습니다.
Secondly, the lecturer casts doubt on allowing volunteers to capture the toads. This is because most of the volunteers will are untrained people. Untrained people cannot distinct between cane toads and national frogs, especially when the two species are young. This might lead native frogs frog to be in a danger. This goes against the reading passage's idea that volunteering campaign to catch the cane toads toad will be one of the easiest ways to destroy the species. 자원봉사를 활용한 방식이 주된 대립 point라는 점이 명확하게 잘 드러나 있습니다. 설명을 위한 detail역시 적절합니다.
Lastly, the lecturer explains that spreading virus to control the number of cane toads toad is not a good idea because it can bring terrible consequences, like threatening nature habitats. According to the lecturer, virus would finally spread into South America, the native habitat of the cane toad species, which will devastate the ecosystem. This rebuffs the reading passage's argument that developing a disease-causing virus can stop the spread spreading of cane toads in Australia by blocking maturing or reproducing the species. 바이러스와 관련해 대립되는 내용이 요약이 적절합니다.
Writing 0–30 score scale
Good (24–30)
전반적으로 내용 정리에 필요한 부분을 잘 노트테이킹해주신 것 같습니다. 각 문단의 point에 초점을 두고 대립되는 내용들도 잘 정리된 편입니다. 제가 정확하게 지문의 내용을 모르는 상태에서 요약 형식이나 detail들만을 가지고 평가한 부분이므로 꼭! 문제지의 답안과 직접 확인하셔서 노트테이킹에서 빠진 부분이나 잘못 이해된 부분은 없는지 내용 체크해주시기 바랍니다. 수고 많으셨습니다^^화이팅!