The lecturer argues that the future for of archaeology in England (capital letter) is bright because of new heritage laws. These laws sufficiently solve the passage's problem that archaeology in England faces crisis.
To begin with, the speaker asserts that precious heritages are not destroyed any more. He says that the new government made a law that render people and company to be punished if they damage or destroy old artifacts. So nowadays, company lets investigators to examine the area (what area? Give more detail for example construction area) prior to build the buildings.
This method can overcome the problem of damaging of the historical remains mentioned in the reading passage.
Moreover, the professor insists that new money has been providing to archaeological research. From where? From the government? Give more detail. He mentions that the new heritage law force the private companies to fund lots of money to the researches. So a the budget of archaeological work increased rather than running out. This is in response to the reading passage's point that money on archaeology is running out.
Finally the lecturer contends that England government created grants and programs to support archaeological field, so there are a host of firms related to archaeology as well as numerous job opportunities. This strategy addresses the reading passage's problem that it is very hard to find jobs in Archaeology, so students do not want to major in Archaeology
USE CAPITIAL LETTEER!!!!!!!!!!! THE FIRST ALPHABET OF THE SENTENCE AND PROPER NOUNS SHOULD BE IN CAPITAL LETTER
Some of the sentences were written with lack of details use a/the front of the noun properly.