▶ Your Answer :
Some people insist that entreprenuer should employ their employee for their entire lives. However, in my opinion, I disagree with the statement for two reasons. This is because it will detriment for company also worsen young's unemployment.
To begin with, if company decide that their employee for full life, it would vast amount of negative effect on their company. Since employee ensured their entire lives for working in their company, they will not work hard and become delinquency. Then it will makes efficency of work lower and hinder company from earning profit. A recent study of job markets did the experiment with two groups in order to compare the employee's attitude to work. One group consists of one hundreds of people who ensured their work period during their entire life. Another group consists of one hundreds of people who did not ensured their work period then they must work competently for not fired. As I mentioned before, the first group who ensured their full-period working for entile lives, they tend to lazy at work and did not any effort for boosting their productivity.
In contrast, the other group workers tend to more product for company and work better because they did not want to be fired from company so they worked competitive. This result shows that ensuring entire lives working for employee is harmful for company.
Also, it worsen young people's unemployment problem. Due to this employment system, it is hard for young and competent people after gratuated to get their job. If company change the employ system then hire employee considering their ability, they would employ more competent and smart employee. It will solve unemployment problem also better for company because they will earn more profit and raise productivity. A recent job marketing research team proved this point. One company changed their employment system from entire life to based on worker's performance. Then they found that after changed their hire-system then hired young and competent workers based on their ability can understand work positions and circumstances better and propel their work than delinquent employee who hired before changed the system.
To sum up, I think that hiring employee for entire lives is harmful for company and young competent job-seeker. This is not only prohibit company from earning benefit also hinder competent young people from having their job.For these two reasons, I disagree with the statement. |