■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer : The reading passage asserts that fuel(대소문자)-cell engines have several advantages over internal-combustion engines and will probably soon replace them. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points to contradict the argument. First of all, the lecturer questions the validity of the point in the reading passage's claim that the fact that fuel-cell engines utilize easily available (이 부분이 무슨 뜻인지 모르겠어요.). This attributed to the fact that it must be kept cold and making cold tech is not easy. Thus this counters the reading passage's claim that renewable resources make them attractive. Secondly, the lecturer casts doubt on the point made by the reading passage's claim that hydrogen-based fuel cells are attractive because they will solve many of the world's pollution problems. This is because it requires lots of energy to keep (목적어가 필요합니다.) cold. So fuel-cell engines create more pollution. Consequently, this refutes the reading passage's claim that hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines are attractive because they are eco-friendly. Last not but least, the lecturer disagrees with the reading passage's claim that fuel-cell engines will soon be economically competitive because people will spend less money to operate a fuel-cell engine than they will to operate an internal-combustion engine (여기도 무슨 뜻인지 모르겠어요.). It is obvious that the fuel-cell engine's components are so rare and expensive. As a result, with such reasoning, This opposes the reading passage's claim that a fuel-cell automobile is more efficient than an automobile powered by an internal-combustion. |
|
1. 각 문단 시작 전에 tab 버튼 눌러서 들여쓰기 해주세요.
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
3. 문장 중간중간에 빠져있는 문장성분(요소)들이 많은 것 같습니다.
그래서 의미 전달이 상당히 모호해져있는 상태입니다.
빠진 단어가 없나 꼼꼼히 확인해주세요.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*