▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends some possible
methodologies to protect frogs. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up
several points to contradict this argument.
First of all, the speaker argues that to
prohibit prohibiting the uses of pesticides near frog habitats is not practical
economically. This policy would result in decreased yields of crops in specific
regions and give disadvantages for farmers in those spots. This casts doubts on
the reading passage which states making illegal to use pesticides near frog habitats
is a plausible solution. The writer maintains that pesticides are important
factor that should be controlled because they disturb the nerve system of
frogs to control as they disturb nerve system of frogs .
Also, according to the lecturer, utilizing
anti-fungal medication for frogs is an expensive and a complicated method.
Since the medicine should be treated for each frog entity, some people should
capture them. Not only this, their offspring need needs (offspring은 단수 주어 입니다) another treatment and this
might be require continuous efforts require continuous efforts. This refutes the reading passage's assertion
that making use of medication to protect frogs from fungus with deadly effect
might be effective. Frogs are vulnerable to these specific type of fungus
because they thicken the skin of frogs and dehydrate.
The
final point made by the lecturer is that excessive water use is not the main
cause of diminished natural habitats of frogs. Actually, global warming is the
main reason, thus efforts to reduce uses of water will not be effective as much
as commonly considered. This counters the writer's claim that human activities
are the main reasons to destroy natural habitats of frogs.
점수: 25 어색한 표현들이 많은 통하형 에세이입니다. 이러한 표현들은 에세이 플로우를 방해하기 때문에 제가 지적한 부분들을 숙지하면서 에세이를 서술하시길 바랍니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이는 리딩이나 리스닝이 둘 다 서로 구체적으로 잘 설명하고 있습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |