*진하게 표시한 부분은 제가 파악한 문단의 주요 내용이니 참고하세요^^
Whereas the reading passage suggests several ways to suppress the propagation of environmentally harmful species in Austrailia, the Cane toads, the lecturer refutes the reading passage's suggestion by pointing out that the method to suppress the Cane toad population will not work. topic과 두 지문의 반대되는 입장을 간결하게 잘 소개한 서론입니다.
To start with, the reading passage contends that fencing land can prevent the Cane toads from spreading to spread into another region. However, the lecturer argues that fencing land won't prevent the Cane toads from migrating to migrate into another place. This is because if the land migration have been blocked, the Cane toads can just always take the route by rivers and streams. Even if humans fence rivers and streams to stop the migration of the Cane toads, it will block the currents of water and disrupt fish migration. fence를 해결책으로 제시한 reading passage의 주장과 그에 대해 반박하는 lecturer의 주장/근거가 잘 정리된 문단입니다.
Secondly, the reading passage alleges that volunteer workers can effectively control the population of the Cane toads by killing them. On the other hand, the lecturer asserts that volunteers can't distinguish between the native Tree frogs and the Cane toads, which is because they are very similar to one and another, indicating that the volunteer workers might harm the Tree frogs, instead of killing off the Cane toads. 자원봉사자를 활용하자는 방안에 대한 반박내용이 잘 정리되어 있습니다. 내용 설명에 필요한 detail들을 잘 잡아주신 것 같아요.
Lastly, the lecturer suggests the possibility that the virus named BIV, specifically designed to wipe of the population of the Cane toads in Austrailia, which is mentioned in reading passage, might cause environmental disaster just like the Cane toads in Austrailia did. If the BIV spreads into where the Cane toads are imported from, the detrimental effect of the virus would be unstoppable, indicating that leading to extinction of the indigenous Cane toads. 적절한 summary입니다. 이 부분에서 두 지문의 대립구도가 잘 드러나서 정리될 수 있도록 문장이 불필요하게 길어지지 않게끔 내용 단위에서 간결하게 끊어주는 것도 좋겠습니다.
전반적으로 잘 쓴 글입니다. 내용이 잘못 이해된 부분만 없다면 충분히 good level바으실 거예요^^ 문제지의 답안과 직접 확인하셔서 노트테이킹에서 빠진 부분이나 잘못 이해된 부분은 없는지 다시 한 번 내용 체크해주시기 바랍니다. 수고 많으셨습니다^^화이팅!