▶ Your Answer : The lecturer argues that there is sufficient possibility that a large size of civilizations once existed in the Amazon for three reasons. This directly contradicts the claim made in the reading that civilizations are not likely to exist there. First, since there are a lot of edible vegitations like berries, bananas, and nuts, large amount of humans could be supported. Although most of soil are acidic, fertile soil also exists partly; ashes from volcanic eruptions which are scattered widely made earth more productive. These would allow people to cultivate crops as much as they manage to survive. On top of that, the lecturer contends that a wide variety of animals living in the Amazon could be abundant resources of protein which is essential to human's existance. This rebuts the reading passage's claim that since the Amazon does not provide settings which can let food animals like cows and sheep proliferate sufficiently, people also could not gain abundant protein from them. Finally, the lecturer asserts that although there is little stone that is generally used for constructing buildings, wood can serve as an alternative material. The absent of findings of structures is from the very hot and humid weather in the Amazon which wood is likely to wear out and the thick jungle which can veil buildings. This challenges the idea presented in the reading passage that since sparsely, stone is in the place, people could not build structures, and there are unlikely for civilzations to exist. The absent of findings of structures is from the very hot and humid weather in the Amazon which wood is likely to wear out and the thick jungle which can veil buildings. 그리고. 마지막 문단 이 문장..요.. 특히 좀 찝찝 합니당.. 채점자는 and the thick jungle which can veil buildings.이것을 from을 같이 쓰는 병렬구조로 봐줄 것인지말입니당 ㅠㅠ |