▶ Your Answer :
Both the lecture and the reading hold different position, respectively, over the issue of whether congestion fees should be imposed on drivers who enter the city or not. The lecturer’s argument is formed around the many points that are in direct contrasts to the material in reading passage.
To begin with, the lecturer claims that businesses in the city is not affected from congestion fees. Because, through the lasted customer, the businesses would be able to recover in few days. This contrasts the writer’s argument that since congestions fees, fewer people would enter the city. And the fees give negative effects on businesses in the city.
On top of that, the lecturer argues that congestion fees would not give stress to the people. To be specific, people will use public transportation when congestion fees will be execute. This counters the reading passage’s viewpoint that the fees would put a financial burden on people.
Lastly, the lecturer asserts that congestions fees would not affect delivery businesses. In fact, delivery businesses would be able to more faster and lower price. because through the fees, city can be resolve traffic jam. This casts doubt on the writer’s claim that congestions fees increase delivery expenses and suffer the small businesses. |