A lot of controversies exist over whether we should
get information from various sources or just one sources. However, I
think we are just fine with one sources because, for example, internet
can provide us (with) various information, and
because looking up information via several sources costs time, and is
tiresome.
To start with, I think using internet is just enough
to get information. (In) Modern days, provides
many information with many shapes-for example, radio, TV, newspaper-, (wrong order of words) but since internet can provide
us (with) various forms of information, there is
no need to look up for information from varying sources. The internet can
provide us (with) information with (in) many forms like video, sound, image, words
(and texts). I think this aspect of internet
solves every redundant media of internet (This
contradicts your earlier message that Internet foregoes such redundancy. Figure
out better ways to put this idea.) (well, at least for young
people like us). To be specific, a research conducted in Yale University by
professor John Holstein indicates that forms of information have changed along
the change of generation. For example, the graph of the paper (The “graph of the paper?” What is this?) showed that
our parents relied upon televisions, and radios, and newspapers as a (the) source(s) of
information, but our generation can get information only from the internet.
This need for various media is being reduced, which concurs with my point.
(Make sure you make accurately
differentiated singular and plural verbs. This is rudimentary.)
Secondly, I think we don't need various sources to get
information, because I think 'foraging' for information from various sources
are just waste of time and waste of energy. This is because we have to add up
many information from various sources to picture decent quality of information (“picturing the information” sounds odd). But if we
use one source (of) information, we don't have
to work on adding up information. You might ask that the information can be
biased, but I think the internet can solve this problem either (as well). The internet can save time and energy. For
example, I was researching about various taboos related to food, which is about
cultural anthropology. I had to look up dozens of books to get accurate information,
but when I searched about taboos of food in Wikipedia, it provided me (with) purely condensed form of information, (which was) just what I needed. So looking up internet
helped me greatly saving all those times and efforts I
would have spent foraging for information from books.
(Very important: ‘information’ is a singular
noun.)
In summary, I think getting information from one
source is more beneficial because, first, we don't have to look up (the / for) information from various sources and
second, getting information from one source can save energy and time.