▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the professor casts doubt on the reading passage's idea that admission fees of national parks are unfair to people. The professor asserts that there are many advantages of admission fees for the following subsequent three reasons.
First and foremost, according to the reading passage, visitors can feel unreasonable about certain national parks' fees. Since national parks are administered by the government, they can gain double-charging between the government and the public. In opposition to this argument, the professor claims that if people pay taxes to national parks, the government' finance can be used to other subjects. Furthermore, it is more sensible and fair that people who visit national parks charge fees.
On top of that, the reading passage describes that admission fees can discourage the number of people visiting the park. Therefore, national parks should eliminate admission fees to increase the number of visitors. In contrast, the professor argues that charging the visitors do not dishearten them from visiting. It can distribute people range from national parks visited many people to the place came fewer people.
Lastly, the writer of the reading passage states that admission fees make the quality of service lower and thus those who visit national parks can be unsatisfied because there is no difference in light of service. However, the professor points out that satisfaction has no relation to admission fees. Recently, many national parks raise money to improve service and they provide people with a unique opportunity such as wildlife sightings, so people can do special experiences. |