▶ Your Answer : Some people say that reading a book at one time once (at one time은 '한번에' 또는 '한번에 몰아서' 라는 뜻입니다.) is enough for their reading. However, in my opinion, I disagree with this idea for several reasons. Not only they can not only (두가지 구문 다 they can을 사용하기 때문에 they can 뒤에 not only를 붙이고 but also뒤엔 they can이 생략 가능합니다.) get the depth of the reading, (전치사 of의 부재로 인해 완전히 어색한 문장이 되어버렸습니다. 책의 깊이 라는 뜻으로 쓰신거라면 ~의 라는 뜻을 가진 of를 꼭 쓰셔야 합니다.) but also they can feel new emotions.
First of all, If people read a book twice or more than, (than을 쓰실땐 뒤에 무조건 비교 대상이 붙어야 합니다.) they would see things which they missed. Most of people, they are (Most of people에서 of는 필요하지 않습니다. 그리고 be used to는 하나의 숙어입니다.) used to read a book when they have their spare time. Thus, I can say that it is difficult to catch everything when they read a book just once. As for me, I read "to my best tree for the lime orange" twice time. (twice에는 time의 뜻이 포함되어 있습니다. twice 홀로 쓰시거나 two times 라고 쓰실수 있습니다.) When I first read the book first time, (전치사 없이 그대로 first time을 쓰시는건 틀린 표현입니다. for the first time이라고 표현하거나 when I first read 라고 표현하시는게 맞습니다.) I didn't not (에세이에서 줄임 표현은 쓰시지 않는게 좋습니다.) know the real meaning and I just reading (동사 + ing 형은 be 동사와 함께 쓰여야 합니다. 이 구문에서는 과거형이 쓰여야 하기 때문에 I was just reading이라고 하시거나 i just read라고 하시는게 맞습니다.) the printed pages, did not considering the lesson. But However, (문장의 첫 단어로 but, and, also, or 등과 같은 접속사로 시작하는 것은 좋지 않습니다.) when I read the book twice, then I recognized the devotion of a lime orange trees for to the main character like parant's love forward toward (forward는 '앞으로' 라는 뜻입니다. '향하는' 이라는 뜻을 가진 toward가 맞는 표현입니다.) their son.
On top of that, people also can also (also는 조동사 뒤에 오는것이 더 자연스러운 표현입니다.) get new sentiments. By reading the same book twice or more in different circumstances, people would enjoy new sentiments through reading of the same book twice or more than. (문장의 뜻이 명확하지 못했습니다. 다른 환경에서 책을 읽는다는 것과 두번이상 책을 읽는다는 것 둘 다 새로운 감성을 자아낸다는 뜻이라면 By reading the same book twice or more, or reading it in different circumstances 가 맞는 표현이 됩니다.) As they get older, they would change their own value, thus they would have other different sights. For example, exemple, I aroused totally different sentiments from reading " The Alchemist" during childhood and adulthood. Before 10 years ago, when I was an elemantary school student, I just skipped the message " (문장을 이을땐 항상 접속을 시켜주는 부사가 필요합니다.) To find one's mythology of own sprit" in the book. However, when I grow got older and older, that meaning is was crucial to me and I made it as my life's lesson. Thus, If I had read the book just one time in my childhood, I would have read just the same kind of novel and nothing would have been given to me. (if 가정법을 쓰실땐 가정하는 부분을 과거완료의 시제를 쓰고 결과 부분은 현재완료의 시제를 씁니다.)
To sum up, I satisfy with this the statement because it gives more meaning and new feelings through reading twice or more than. For these reasons, I can firmly insist that reading a book is more than once is good better for people. |