▶ Your Answer :
In
this set of materials, the reading and the lecture deal with probability of
life on the Red Planet. Regarding this topic, the lecturer claim that evidences
of organism are not enough to verify life in Mars environment. This contradicts
the writer’s assertion that Mars is capable of supporting life, some types evidences
of life could show on the mars.
First
of all, according to a lecturer, Methane gas could exist in inorganic. Thus this
is not prove life existence in Mars. This refutes the writer’s argument that methane
on the Red Planet could be biological beginning.
Moreover,
the lecturer goes on to say that meteorite could come to other region. Because distance
between the earth and the Red Planet is far away. And the evidence is
observation before long time. This counters the writer’s claim that fossil-like
object could be the first evidence of life outside Earth, and finding them in
the same rock wit carbon presents
Lastly,
the lecturer maintains that mars has not liquid water. Because there is very
low temperature. So most ice only exists in there. This challenges the writer’s
assertion that the most important evidence is the observation of water on the
surface of Red planet.
초보 토플러가 시험 십일 남았는데 처음 써 보았습니다 ㅜ 시간 맞춰 놓고 썼는데 들은 내용도 빼먹고 패러프라이징 이런게 잘 안되네요 문법도 잘 안맞게 쓴 것 같은데 잘부탁드립니다 ! 대략적인 점수같은것도 알려주시면 감사하겠습니다 |