▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that anthropologists have come up with the cause of Hohokam's rapid disintegration. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument. to contradict this argument First of all, the lecturer points that the Hohokam people were not forced to relocate due to devastating flood. This is because at At (this is because는 적절하지 않는 표현 입니다) that time, flood was common in the region, so they have capable to recover flood. This casts doubt on the reading passage that the Hohokam people were forced to relocate due to devastating flood. Moreover, in the lecture, the point is made that Hohokam society did not collapse as a result of a deadly epidemic. It is true that foreigners brought diseases, but foreigners were Spain people Spanish not European. This refutes author's view on the reading that Hohokam society collapsed as a result of a deadly epidemic. Final point made by the lecturer is that the Hohokam civilization did not disintegrate due to internal conflict. This is because the The Hohokam leader ruled the class and was not weakened by overpopulation. Also, the Pima Indians was not reliable. This is different on the idea in the reading that the Hohokam civilization disintegrated due to internal conflict.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족합니다 특히 그냥 리스닝에서 하는 말을 똑같이 배껴서 서술한 거 같습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 각 단락에서 리딩에 대한 정보가 한 문장으로만 서술되어있는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박하는 부분을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |