▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that there is a (possibility는 단수형 명사이므로 관사 a가 앞에 붙어야합니다) sufficient possibility that a large size of civilizations once existed in the Amazon for three reasons. This directly contradicts the claim made in the reading that civilizations are not likely to exist there.
First, since there are a lot of edible vegitations like berries, bananas, and nuts, large amount number (amount는 셀수 없는 명사와 함께 쓰입니다. humans는 셀수 있는 명사이기 때문에 number를 씁니다) of humans could be supported. Although most of soil are is (soil은 셀수 없는 명사이므로 단수형으로 쓰입니다. are이 아닌 is가 되어야합니다) acidic, fertile soil also exists partly; ashes from volcanic eruptions which are scattered widely made earth more productive. These would allow people to cultivate crops as much as they manage to survive.
On top of that, the lecturer contends that a wide variety of animals living in the Amazon could be abundant resources of protein which is essential to for (be essential for은 하나의 숙어입니다) human's existance. This rebuts the reading passage's claim that since the Amazon does not provide settings which can let food feed (food animals를 주어로 쓰신거 같은데 사실 food animals라는것이 무엇을 뜻하는지 모르겠습니다. which can let animals like cows and sheep proliferate sufficiently라고 쓰시거나 제가 바꾼것 처럼 쓰시면 될것 같습니다) animals like cows and sheep to proliferate sufficiently, people also could not gain abundant protein from them.
Finally, the lecturer asserts that although there is little stone that is generally used for constructing buildings, wood can serve as an alternative material. The absent of findings of structures absence of structural remains (of의 연속적인 사용은 반복적으로 보일수 있을 뿐 더러 문장 자체가 약간 복잡하게 바뀝니다. of를 한번만 쓸수있는 방법은 명사를 형용사로 바꾸어 사용하는 것입니다. 그리고 absent는 동사나 형용사로 쓰이므로 명사형인 absence로 바꿔줍니다) is from the very hot and humid weather in the (아마존과 같은 유일명사 앞에는 the를 붙이지 않습니다) Amazon which where (장소의 관계대명사로는 where을 쓰시는게 좋습니다) wood is likely to wear out and the thick jungle which (from과 같이 쓰는 병렬구조로 보이기 매우 힘듭니다. 앞선 Amazon에 대한 관계대명사가 이미 와버렸기 때문이죠. 이럴땐 굳이 from이나 where과 병렬구조로 쓰시기 보다는 그냥 따로 쓰시는게 더 좋습니다) can veil buildings. This challenges the idea presented in the reading passage that since sparsely, stone is in the place, people could not build structures, and there are civilizations were unlikely for civilzations to be existed.
The absent of findings of structures is from the very hot and humid weather in the Amazon which wood is likely to wear out and the thick jungle which can veil buildings.
그리고. 마지막 문단 이 문장..요.. 특히 좀 찝찝 합니당.. 채점자는 and the thick jungle which can veil buildings.이것을 from을 같이 쓰는 병렬구조로 봐줄 것인지말입니당 ㅠㅠ |