| |
| |
|
Both the lecture and reading hold different positions, respectively, on the issue of instrumental musical courses. The lecture's argument is formed around many points that are in direct contrast to the material in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading passage mentions that having instrumental music classes is time consuming for students, and it is better to use
Second, the reading passage says that it wastes money due to expensive instruments. On the other hand, the lecture's argument refutes this by arguing that there are volunteers to teach students for free, and schools can get instruments through donations
Finally, the reading passage points out that there are few students who have the talent to be a musician. In contrast, the lecture's argument counters this by claiming that students can express their feelings and be more creative through these courses. Moreover, they may not recognize their talent at first, but later, they could become
In conclusion, the reading passage represents three aspects with regards to music classes for instruments. However, the lecture's argument makes it clear none of these characteristic justify the reading passage's claim.