The reading passage is worring
(raises concern over) about the phenomenon that
the number of doctors in rural areas is decreasing. The
lecturer, however, contradicts the passage by suggesting three attractions of (to) working
in rural areas.
First of all, the lecturer claims that with government
policy supporting medical school graduates with debt forgiveness (relief), young
doctors can feel free of the concern about their high
level of debt (level of interest / debt).
Long waiting lists for the positions (in the rural
area) prove the policy's successful results.
In addition, advanced technology such as the telephones, e-mail services and online chatting provide
young physicians with various ways to contact experienced doctors whenever they
have any problems. Thus they can obtain immediate feedback to compansate (compensate
for) their lack of practical trainings. This effectively rebuffs the
reading passage's view that young doctors in need of good guide and mentors
usually prefer to work in cities.
Last but not least, the lecturer claims that being in
the countryside never means total isolation from the world. Actually, quiet and
peaceful rural areas not only allow young doctors to offset their stress resulted from hectic schedule, but also help
them enjoy a well-balanced lifestyle. In addition, those who have grown up in
such environment tend to choose working in the countryside. This shows that the
reading passage's fear that young doctors refer to rural areas as boring,
slow-paced places is unnecessary.
(As you have written in the last paragraph,
you must introduce the reading passage’s claim, if not in length.)