▶ Your Answer : Both the lecture and reading hold different position,respectively,on the issue of group studying. The lecturer’s argument is formed around many ideas that are in direct contrast to the reading passage.
First, professor mentions that group studying encourage some students to study hard and will be beneficial for students who are not familiar with certain subjects. However, the lecturer refutes this by claiming that some of them do not work assignments properly that they have to do and do not show up during period of group studying. It may bring about lowering the morale for reponsibility for studying.
Next, professor says that group studying can support each other. This is becuase members of study group can share knowledge and help others to get to understand difficult topic. On the other hand, the speaker of lecture rebuts this by arguing that group stduying can make a lot of freeloader. As a result, students who are relly hard to do have much workloads and cannot help but to taking care of jobs.
Finally, the reding passage points out that group studying save time to search information. So, It can split volumne of information they have to find. In contrast, the lecture counters the reading’s point by claiming that smarter students are highly likely to waste their time due to reviewing topic for weaker students. On top of that, they mighy have a role for teaching weaker students.
|