▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that the living roofs, or green roofs do not have much advantages as expected. This refutes the author’s point that green roofs have advantages that conventional concrete roofs didn’t have. 적절한 서론입니다.
To begin with, the professor mentions that without accessibility, the increase of total area of parks in the city would be meaningless. The professor had been to a city with parks of top of the roof, but he wasn’t able to visit any of them. 왜 접근성이 없으면 안되는지는 안나왔나요?.. 교수가 갔지만 갈 수 없었다.. 다음에 무슨 말이 있었거나 했을 거 같아요.. 주장에 대한 예로 부족하다는 생각이 듭니다.. 연결이 안되니까요..This directly contradicts the idea mentioned in the reading passage that rooftop areas of large buildings can be used to solve the problem caused by lack of park areas in city nowadays.
Second of all, the lecturer living roofs do not offer spectacular views for people. Although the roofs themselves may be beautiful, people walking on sideways wouldn’t be able to look at the rooftops of buildings. The professor gives his own example, that he lives in a city with lots of green roofs, but he never had a chance to enjoy the beautiful views of green roofs. This refutes the point made in the passage that living roofs offer great views for many people.
Last of all, the speaker believes that living roofs are not economically profitable. There will be The expenses for installing, managing and repairing the roofs are so huge that, so it will outweigh the cost savings from saving energy.-> there would be even economic loss. This cast doubt on the writer’s idea that green roofs offer cost savings because they save energy. 수고 하셨습니다. 리스닝 부분 좀 더 보강해 주세요 ~
|