▶ Your Answer : Both the reading and the lecturer hold different positions, on an issue of the number of women in science. The lecturer's argument is formed around many points that are in direct contrast to the materials in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading passage points out that gender bias make women depressed to be a science or a police man. However, the lecturer refutes this by insisting that nowadays, many teachers try to encourage women students to be educated with physics or chemistry class. This will be able to incite women to learn and be engrossed in the science they had viewed it as a grueling course.
Second, the reading passage says that low salary for women in science discourage the women to be a science. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuffs this by cclaiming that scholaships and financially supports have been given to women who have tried to be majored in science classes. So, they don't have to be worried about the shortage of financial supports.
Finally, the reading passage mentions that a science field is male-dominated. However, the lecturer counters the point in the reading passage by claiming that women's feature of emotional and sensible organization prevents them from being competitive. Also, this feature result in more practical and fun activities in science, encouraging them to have long run in science field.
In conclusion, the reading passage presents three aspects with regards to the number of women in science. However, the lecturer's assertion makes it clear that none of these characteristics justify the reading passage's claim. |