▶ Your Answer : Both the reading and the lecturer hold different positions, on an issue of the number of women in science. The lecturer's argument is formed around many points that are in direct contrast to the materials in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading passage points out that gender bias makes women depressed to be a science scientist or a police man. However, the lecturer refutes this by insisting that nowadays, many teachers try to encourage women female students to be educated with physics or chemistry class. This will be able to incite women to learn and be engrossed in the science they had viewed it as a grueling course.
Second, the reading passage says that low salary for women in science discourage the women them to be a scientist. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuffs this by claiming that scholarships and financially supports have been given to women who have tried to be majored in science classes. So, they don't have to be worried about the shortage of financial supports.
Finally, the reading passage mentions that the a science field is male-dominated. However, the lecturer counters the point in the reading passage by claiming that women's feature of emotional and sensible organization prevents them from being competitive.<(science field에 남성이 많은 것과 영성이 competitive하지 않는것과 무슨 연관이 있는지 모르겠습니다) Also, this feature result in more practical and fun activities in science, encouraging them to have a long run in the science field.
In conclusion, the reading passage presents three aspects with regards to the number of women in science. However, the lecturer's assertion makes it clear that none of these characteristics justify the reading passage's claim.
Overall Score: Fair (17~23) Comment: 글안에 쓰여진 코멘트를 보시면 되실것같습니다. 문법상 크게 문제는 없으시나 영어로는 형태에 따라 의미가 많이 다릅니다. 즉 to be a science은 논리적으로 말이안됩니다. 인간이 과학이 되지는 못하고 과학자는 될수가 있습니다. 그렇기 때문에 scientist라고 해주시는게 좋습니다. |