In this
set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture deal with the
credibility of online degree program. Regarding this topic, the lecturer argues
that online degree program has gained reputation and credibility. This
contradicts (to) the writer’s viewpoint that
there is online degree program with suspicion.
First of
all, according to the lecturer, many programs completely
verify a sense of (have a good) credibility
(This sentence is hard to understand.. I wonder if I
made the right correction.). This program leads
to (are) produce(d by) the world(-)class
professors. Also, students graduating from their program become a young
professor. This point counters the writer’s assertion
that online services need to establish solid reputation.
Moreover,
the lecturer go(es) on to say that students
enrolling in (to)
online degree program can interact with other people by sending e-mail. Also,
they can chat with other people. Therefore, they can achieve multi-national (their
own communication) system. This challenges the writer’s argument that
students from cyber (online) universities have less social skills. In
contrast, (the reading passage asserts that the)
students using conventional method have opportunity to interact with students
and professors.
Lastly,
the lecturer maintains that cheating is easy to prevent. There is method called
“proctor service”, which allows student to take a test in same places (I don’t get this sentence.). This refutes the
writer’s claim that online degree program’s professors do not monitor student
activities on test. As a result, the writer’s says that cheating is a
widespread problem.
(This essay has a couple sentences that are hard to
understand. This could be a crucial challenge to your scoring of higher score.)