▶ Your Answer :
Both the lecture and the reading hold
different positions, respectively, on the issue of advantages of green roofs
over conventional concrete roofs. The lecture’s argument is formed around many
points that are in direct contrast to the material in the reading passage.
First, the reading passage points out that
rooftops can be used instead of building new parks in the city. However, the
lecturer refutes this by arguing that the rooftops may not solve the space
shortage since there is no point if people cannot access the parks installed on
the roofs.
Second, the reading passage mentions that
living roofs proffers a great landscape for people. On the other hand, the
speaker in the lecture rebuts this by claiming that people literally impossible
to see those views. This is because, people usually walk through the sidewalks
so that they are not able to reach the sight on the top of the buildings.
Finally, the reading passage says that
green rooftops grants colossal amount of cost savings than the conventional
roofs those. In contrast, the lecture counters the reading’s point by claiming
that green rooftops requires additional costs. To be specific, the installation
cost, the maintainance cost, and the cost that would be spent for repairing the
leakage from the soil and the vegetables outweight the savings.
In conclusion, the reading passage presents
three aspects with regarding that the green roofs have many advantages than the
concrete ones. However, the lecturer’s argument makes it clear that none of the
characteristics justify the reading passage’s claim.
실제 시험처럼 작성해봤습니다! 20분 시간 재면서 했고 다쓰고 나니 5분정도 남았습니다 가능하시다면 예상점수 부탁드리겠습니다! 참고로 Actual Test (test1) 통합형입니다 ㅎ |