▶ Your Answer :
An intriguing topic of discussion at hand is whether or not the second reading of a book is more interesting than the first reading. The answer to this question can greatly vary depending on the individual perspectives. Thus, the jury may still be out, but as far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that the first reading of a book and reading various books is more interesting and advantageous. In this essay, I will present two reasons supporting my standpoint as follows. First, it allows one to broaden view of life. Second, the second reading of a book is not good for one’s health.
To begin with, the first reading of a book and reading various books enables one to widen view of life. This is attributed to the fact that reading a lot of books at first time will expose one to different worlds of life styles, basic customs, and cultures from various contexts of books, and he or she can be familiarized with and embrace other cultures and people. Thus, one can make different friends with different backgrounds, which helps one to reduce prejudice and be open-minded toward strangers. For example, there had been a study conducted by the Seoul National University in Korea. The researchers surveyed a thousand people to see if reading books just first time is good for readers. Of all, 78.1 percent of them stated that it is effective for them because they can read lots of books without the second reading and gain various experience indirectly, leading to broaden their perspectives. For this reason, the Seoul National University in Korea recommends their students to read books first time and various books. Therefore, the first reading is more interesting than the second reading of a book as it helps readers to widen view of their life.
In addition, the second reading of a book is detrimental to one’s health. This is due to the fact that readers become stressed out when trying to understand the contents of books, and stress is one of the main factors of diseases through weakening the immune system. Thus, readers are likely to be weaker when dealing with the challenges. According to an article, Alex Kim, the Sociology Professor claimed: “People do not need to read books at several times in order to understand the contents of books. This is because as they have to try to understand the whole meaning of connection of sentences, words, and paragraphs in books in order to understand entire contents of books, it is likely that readers become stressed out. However, reading books is for being happy, obtaining information, and making one’s mental health good. For this reason, people have to avoid reading books at several times.” Thus, the second reading of a book is not effective for people since they easily become stressed out when dealing with difficulties.
In conclusion, I strongly argue for my standpoint on account of the two reasons mentioned above. Once again, although the verdict may still be out, I personally believe that two of my rationales are sufficiently convincing enough to represent the viewpoint of a majority of people who are in favor of my claim.
|