▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that gGenetically modified crops are very useful for humans vastly. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point. Firstly, the professor contends that it is overstated that GM crops can solve the hunger problems in the world. There are already abundant of foods in the world but, the distribution of foods does not only well work. This means that hunger people do does not have a chance to access to get some foods. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that GM crops can help pull off the problem of world poverty. Next, the professor insists that the expense of producing GM crops is more required than the regular crops. Generically, GM crops need more water than the regular ones, it needs more even five times. In the ends, GM crops' producing expense is more expensive than (비교대상누락) the regular ones. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that GM crops make the expense of food lower. Finally, the professor argues that edible vaccines are much easily and quickly spoiled. Therefore, it is hard to continually keep the vaccines for a long time. For a long time keeping, some facilities are needed, developing countries could not afford to have the devices. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that GM crops produce vaccines that can be used more commonly available than the before.
|