▶ Your Answer :
According
to the reading, the author says that agricultural subsidies should be
continuously used because it has many benefits. However, in the lecture, the
professor gives several reasons as a rebuttal for the author's claim.
Firstly,
the speaker insists that agricultural subsidies were not helpful to increase
the total food production at the end. Unfortunately, the preponderance of
subsidies contains ethanol used in gas and oil. Furthermore, because of
subsidies food subsidized food, the native plants not containing the subsidies decrease. This refutes
the author's claim that subsidies are helpful to stabilize the overall food
supplement.
Second of all, the professor asserts that even
though agricultural subsidies help to reduce the price of food, the nutritious
types of food are still expensive. Also, farmers plant only several plants
which has have (plants는 복수 주어 입니다) only small amounts so the food price might increase. This counters
the author's idea that subsidies are beneficial in an economical view because
it helps to offset the cost of farming. Lastly,
the professor suggests that agricultural subsidies cannot promote new job
opportunity. Nowadays, the farm owners prefer to buy new developed apparatus.
In addition, subsidies are useful for only farm owner not for everyone. This
counters the author's point that subsidies activate the rural communities as giving
new jobs.
점수; 23 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이에서는 리딩에 대한 부분이 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
|