▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that a brain scan lie detector have better functions than conventional polygraphs. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's points.
First of all, the professor contends that the new machine is also clumsy to detect a lie when the subject is disposed of avoiding certain topics. If people think or tell the sensitive issue for them, Most of the brain parts are active and it is hard to find a true. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that The brand-new polygraph can detect a lie easily with scanning the certain part of brain that is activated when telling a lie.
Next, the professor insists that it has still chanes to make mistakes in regard to detect a lie. Because all people's brain function and how to operate are different. That means, the brain scan lie detector's way to find a lie has a limit. Therefore, It still needs expert's subjective decisions. This counters the reading passage's assertion that new machine is more objective since this analyzes only the images of specific part.
Finally, the professor argues that there are some tricks to fool the new machine. The complex mental process can disrupt the state-of-the-art machine by activating most of the parts of brain. Also, if the subject can rehearsal the untrue story and can tell a lie like a true, they can disguise the cutting-edge lie detector. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that new machine is not vulnerable to the intentinal tricks using meditaiton and sedative drugs
점수: 27 지적할 부분이 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 서로 구체적으로 자신의 정보를 전달하고 있습니다. 구체적 정보를 통해서 서로의 견해가 무엇인지를 잘 파악할 수 있었습니다. 수고맣으셨습니다. |