▶ Your Answer :
According to the reading passage, single stream recycling is a recycling system in which all paper, plastics, metals, and other containere are ixed into one collection truck instead of being sorted into separated parts and handled sepearately during the collection process. It seems to be effetive method, However its disadvantae is far outweight the advantage of this. However, in the lecture, professor gives several reason as a rebuttal to the author’s point. spelling오류가 정말 너무 많습니다. 아예 이해 할 수 없는 문장들이 너무 많습니다. 주의해주세요 First, the professor insists that assertion regarding threatning human is easily solved. By forcing them to take the security program and to wear safty gear, it can be prevented. In addition, many country have law that every worker should take safty(대체 safty가 뭔가요 스펠링 주의해주세요. 이러한 오류 때문에 제대로 첨삭 할 수 없는 부분이 꽤 됩니다) program in order to work properly. This cast doubt on the reading passage’s assertion that single stream recycling poses a threat to(어느 어휘 뒤에 for이 오고 to 가 오는게 좋은지에 대해 조금 공부가 필요할 것 같습니다) for the workers. Since there is metal and other dangerous recyclables mixed in with paper and other harmless materials, workers can be accidentally injured. Second, the professor argues that claim about contamination can not be the reason. Traditional method also contaminate the land. Using new method is better to use(앞에 using이라는 똑같은 동사가 있는데 바로 똑같은거 쓰는 거는 좋지 않습니다). Because it less harmful relatively. In addition professional worker’s effort can decrease the harmful effect. This counters the reading passage’s suggestion that waste contamination is also a big poblem. Since all of the different recyclables are collected and processed together. It is hard to spot waste. This aspect causes the land to be polluted. Lastly, the professor contends that concerning the economical issue is far fetched. Traditional method nedd many truck. While single stream recyling need only one truck. Moreover single stream recycling can reduce the human work. Therefore newmethod ends up saving money. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that the machines and facories that are able to handle single stream recycling are very complex and expensive to build; thus it is not effective method economically
단수 복수 구분이 전혀 없습니다. 단수 복수 뿐만이 아니라 어휘나 시제 오류등 문장이 아예 이해가 가지 않는 문장들이 꽤 있어서 첨삭이 불가능한 부분이 꽤 있어 읽을 때 너무 아쉬웠습니다. 단순한 문법 오류도 그렇고 특히 스펠링은 proof reading만 하면 다 고쳐지지 주의해서 작성해주세요 |