▶ Your Answer : Reading is against prairie dogs, it claims that they should be extincted for several reasons. The lecturer oppose to this view by criticizing each reasons the reading presented.
To begin with, reading says the holes that made by prairie dogs, which called burrows cause the soil erosion. However, actually prairie dogs prevent the erosion. They dig holes so that make it easier for the water to penetrate into the ground. The top soil can be maintained by removing water. Second, prairie dog does not infect people deadly disease in contrast to reading. It is other rodents that cause the infections. On top of that, they usually keep distance from people, making it less possible to bite one.
Finally, prairie dogs make the grass that cattles consume more nutritious. Reading says prairie dogs eat up 90 percent of the plant in some places in stead of cattle, but lecturer points out it is only the tops of grasses they eat. By removing the upper part of plant, they make vegetation more nutritious.
In conclusion, in contrast of reading, lecturer think prairie dogs are benefitial in the inhabited area. finally paragraph에 내용이 약간 적은 듯 하여 조금 아쉬웠던 것 같습니다 format에 맞게 아주 잘 작성해 주셨으며, 문장들도 잘 연결 되게 잘 작성하셨습니다. 조금씩 어휘 오류가 보이는 듯 한데, proof reading잘 해주시면 될 것 같습니다. |