■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer :The
lecturer argues that although the issue about the Everglades’ ecosystem is
controversial, it will not be destroyed any further. He says the area is recovering
its original condition. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that the ecosystem
and wild animals of the Everglades are being destructed. First, he (단락이 새로 시작되었기 때문에 he가 아닌 lecturer로 교체해주세요) points
out that the extent of chemicals that make water pollution is being reduced.
The government regulates nearby farms using harmful ingredients. Therefore, both the
quantity of fertilizers and the level of noxious from it decreased
significantly.
Next, he
contends that the residents of Florida and the government try to keep soil from
erosion. Thanks to their efforts, the amount of soil is recovered, encouraging plants
to grow. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that all fertile soil of the
area could disappear.
Finally, he
asserts that human developments in the Everglades are decreasing. For example,
the Florida government bought some lands of the Everglades from the inhabitants
and built no construction at all in this area. Several species, such as Florida
panther, could propagate again. |
|
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
3. 전체적으로 디테일이 굉장히 부족한 편입니다.
주어진 자료에서 최대한 많은 evidence를 뽑아서 상세하게 서술해주세요!
(인트로와 길이가 엇비슷합니다.)
4. 문법은 오류가 거의 없습니다.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*