In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer cover the issue of whether industrial revolution has positive effects on the people or not. The writer lists three reasons of the idea that industrial revolution help people dramatically improve their life'quality. However, the lectruer contradicts the reading passage's claims by matching rebutting evidences.
To begin with, while the reading passage argues that the revolution provides rural people with the oppotunity to have a more good better career, the lectuere actually points out that even if it is true that there are many career in the uran, the working condition is bad. To be specifie, the emplyees not only work for a long time, but also get a little pay.
On top of that, the lecturer casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the minig ? develod by the industrial revolution help people health. His main reason is that the coal produced by mining relieves (release뜻하신거 아닌가요?) harmful materials, so people suffer respiratoy disese disease. Also he states that the miner who are exposed the to the mining environment have horrible dangerous (are in horrible danger? 아니면 are horribly dangerous? 뜻이불명확).
Futhermore, the speaker denies the reading passage which maintains that advanced agricultre by the revolution allow people to convenient, by saying that this makes the farmers harder work harder because they have to compete with lagre producer.
조금만 더 자잘한 것에 신경쓰시면 20점 충분히 넘으실 수 있을것 같습니다 :) |