In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer cover the issue of whether industrial revolution has positive effects on the people or not. The writer lists three reasons of the idea that industrial revolution help people dramatically improve their life'quality. However, the lectruer contradicts the reading passage's claims by matching rebutting evidences.
To begin with, while the reading passage argues that the revolution provides rural people with the oppotunity to have a more good career, the lectuere actually points out that even if it is true that there are many career in the uran, the working condition is bad. To be specifie, the emplyees not only work for long time, but also get a little pay.
On top of that, the lecturer casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the minig develod by the industrial revolution help people health. His main reason is that the coal produced by mining relieves harmful materials, so people suffer respiratoy disese. Also he states that the miner who are exposed the the mining environment have horrible dangerous.
Futhermore, the speaker denies the reading passage which maintains that advanced agricultre by the revolution allow people to convenient, by saying that this make the farmers harder work because they have to compete with lagre producer. |