▶ Your Answer :
The problems related to playing a game become progressively more comprehensive. Many people debate whether or not people can be fun only when they win a game. This is an intriguing question because opinion concerning this issue can be different depending on the individual perspectives. As for me, however, I would like to insist that the main purpose of playing a game is not to win for fun, for the following reasons.
First of all, people can be fun in various aspects when they play a game, regardless of who win, because fun comes out of the process of playing a game and interacting with persons. In general, people involve competition in a game. However, wining and competition are not a main point about a game. Playing a game is a good time to interact and communicate with one another. For example, when I was in the company, it was hard for me to interact with older colleagues because I was very young, but I could get along with them throughout playing a Korean traditional board game and feel fun among conversations with them. Therefore, people can feel fun irrespective of who win when they communicate each other.
Moreover, fun in a game can be found in different sides. As a rule, people feel exiting when they win. However, people can be exited when they make a strategy against the other side and cooperate with each other. In addition, people can learn how to win a game and accept their loss. For instance, when I was in middle school, I played a soccer with my classmates, although we lost a game, I could find many fun and exiting among cooperating with them and making a strategy against the other side. Accordingly, many points provide people for various fun in different sides without win.
In conclusion, I stand for the perspective that playing a game has more various fun as well as win because not only a game gives people fun by interacting each other, but also fun in a game can be found in different points such as making a strategy and expressing their thinking. |