practice test라서 근거가 2개밖에없는 글입니다!
표현, 문법적인거 체크좀해주세요 ㅠㅠ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In the lecture, the prfoessor casts doubt on the reading passage's idea that the Anasazi culture were collapsed because of "great drought". The professor asserts that there has is no relationship with a sever drought.
To begin with, the professor argues that it is true that there was lack of rainfall and had a horrible drought but it is not the main reason that the cause of causes sudden decrease of Anasazi culture. According to the reading, Anasazi had very mild and favorable weather so that they cannot could not be familiar with sudden change to dry weather. In opposistion to this argument, the professor says that even though they had been through a have suffered sever drought but it was not sever as much as people think. It was enough to feed and live with agriculture.
On top of that, the professor claims that the sudden decline of Anasazi culture was caused by not the lack of water but the war. The reading passage describes how great drought rub off on advanced irrigation system and ruined their agricultural life. On the contrary, the professor states that some people who are from Califonia migrated to Anasazi's area and Anasazi wanted to protect their territory themselves from these migrators. Therefore, they had the war and then it leaded led to the decline of Anasazi culture.
무난합니다~~
위에 수정해논 부분 체크해주세여~~
홧팅하세염!!!