오늘도 써봤는데, 2번째 이유는 나름 쓴것 같은데,
첫번쨰 이유가 약간 문제가 있는듯.. 도와주세요!
Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics
It is often said that the investment of governments on athletic areas is important because it is effective to maintain the health of the country’s people. However, in my point of view, spending money on arts is more beneficial due to the enhancement of human’s creativity and economic growth.
First of all, activities related to arts play a significant role in developing human’s creativities. It is obvious that a good creativity helps people to make a new thing such as innovative products and new theories. Also, the combination with creativity and other abilities such as scientific and economic thinking creates greatly synergy effects. According to the research of Korea National University of Korea in 2003, arts let people enhance their creativity but athletics don’t have any connection with the creativity development of people. This implies that art activities lead to develop the human’s creativity.
In addition, pouring the government budge on art area contribute on the economic improvement of the country. It is undeniable that many famous museums like National art museum in England earn unbound money from global tourists. These gains have greatly impact on the country’s economic growth. This is because it makes lots of job opening and boost industries related arts. Let’s see the survey cited on the Korea times in 2003. The article represented that the economic contribution by arts is much higher than the athletics contribution. This shows that spending money on art fields is important to boost the country’s economy.
In brief, I firmly believe that government should support art activities in order to improve people’s creativity and develop the country’s economy.