▶ Your Answer :
Both the reading and the lecture deal with the electronic voting system. The former states that it is useful for people In contrast, while the latter challenges the writer's view and maintains that it has a lot of problems.
First of all, the reading passage claims that voting by computer is convenient as most of peole people nowadays, use computer and it reduce the waste of ballots by having information in different languages. On the other hand, the lecture disputes that many people will have problem of in the use of using it. It is pointed out He said that according the the a research, one fifths fifth of them the population could not vote with it and will need help.
In addition, although the reading asserts that computerized election that does not need workers to count ballot and shorten the time of voting is effective and fast, the lecture insists that it has problem when it comes to the of double checking of votes. Having the problem of the programm of mechine, In cases the machine got technical problems, there is no way to solve the problem of double checking without revoting but to ask for a revote. Such instance is a waste of time and money for the government as well as the citizens. by all people wasting time and cost.
Finally, while the author states that this voting system could make the result of the election creditable by showing the information about the candidate on the ballot, the lecturer retorts that the system is not reliable. It is refuted that people have no idea their ballot intends well.
|