The lectuere talks about some disavantages of preserving toturiels by using three ways mentioned in the reading passage. This casts doubt on the reading passage's points that there are three useful ways to protect toturiel species.
First, longleaf pine forest is not the best solution. Mandatory for having periodical forest fire is one of the most common charateristics of pine forest. If we make toturiels to this forest, we should fire this periodically. It resluts in many harmful effects(렉쳐예시나오면 그것을 쓸것임). Thus, this counters the reading passage's idea that supporting toturiel with pine forest is crucial way for maintaining them.
Second, raising them in a lab is also not beneficial way. According to the lecture, the lecturer argues that toturiels can be safe from the infection, however, they will be subjective to the environment when we relesase them to real nature. Also, other animals or plants will get infected by toturiels. Therefore, this also refutes the reading passage's argument that keeping them in a lab for a moment is important.
Third, they may comeback, eventhough release them to the nature. From the lecture, it is feasible to say that toturiels will be back to the former place because of thier homing instinct.--- 후기에서 고속도로 있어서 돌아오다 다 죽는다라는 것은 실제 시험볼 때 잘 들어보고 쓸것을 요망하며 잘 연관을 못짓겠네요.This also rebuts the reading passage's claim that trasporting them to suitable habitat can be helpful for keeping specie.
부족한 글이지만 독립형 후기 파는게 급해서,,,,revise 할시간 없습니다.
총 걸린시간 12m 41sec
good luck! |