■ Direction Read the question below. You have 30 minutes to plan, write, and revise your essay. Typically, an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words. ■ Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific reason and examples to support your answer | |
|
Topic :
Letting a friend make a mistake is better than taking action that risks destroying a friendship. | |
|
The speaker asserts that one would let a friend make a mistake rather than take action that risks wrecking a friendship. In some sense, it is true that preserving friendship in any way which let a friend get into a difficulty is ultimately helpful to friends. Especially, with respect to everyday life, it is possible that overlooking a friend`s faults make a friendship stronger. However, If we only focus on the merits of keeping friendship by ignoring the friend`s faults, there are some possibility that we overlook the negative effectiveness of its in outcomes, especially in context of ‘academic fields’ and ‘general good’
First, we could find an area where ignoring the friends’ mistake makes a serious problem. If the subjects work in the academic fields, taking action that a risk destroying a friendship is more helpful to them than letting a friend makes a mistake. For example, a certain professor writes an academic statement and mistakes something in paper, if his or her colleagues just pretend not to know it, the likelihood is that the professor will publish a certain miserable dissertation. In this case, not only the professor would have some trouble, but also the colleagues would have some disadvantage with respect to the progress of learning. Besides, who authentic scholar could dislike the valid critics on his(her) statement?
Second, pointing out the mistake can be right in another sense. Especially, if a certain mistake made by my friend destroys the general good, letting a friend make a mistake will be harmful to many people. For instance, when I was senior, I could solve the organizational problem by pointing out my friend`s wrong policy. At that time, my friend who is the chief of ‘education academy’ suggested a wrong way by narrow-minded choice. Unless I decided to point out his policy, many members are harmed by his wayward behavior. Extremely, if the mistake is something like a murder, who would not try to stop the friend’s fault?
To sum, despite the necessity of ignoring the mistake of the friend, both scholarship fields and general good tell us that taking action could be right. Therefore I would agree to the idea of the speaker if there is no chance that ‘academic fields’ and ‘general good’ are significant.
| |
이런 주제가 더 어려운 듯하네요.-_-; 막 쓸수도 없는 노릇이고..엉엉..전번에 작문이 잘 안된다고 지적 받았는데요.
문법책도 좀 더 뒤져보게 되었고, 첨삭해주신거 보고도 느낀점이 많았습니다. 감사합니다. ㅠㅠ