The lecturer discusses that the problems of separating students into grades by chronological age. This contradicts the reading passage that students are should be divided in to chronological groups.
First of all, the speaker explains that the school don't consider about students' individual differences. There are social, mental and physical gaps between studetns. Some are more mature than others, so deviding students cause problems. This directily opposes the reading passage's claim that age of six children starts general studying in a school with progress through twelve grades.
말씀하시는 내용은 passage의 claim이라기 보다는 그냥 사실을 서술한것같네요.
deviding students cause problems는 학생을 나누는 것 자체가 문제라는얘긴데,
제가 문제를 못들어봐서 모르겠지만 그내용이 아니지않나 싶네요 :)
Secondly, the speaker argues that it isn't a positive way to separate students for by their age. Also, he states that repeating the year would be negative. Some can't understand the class due to the poor concepts, but others already know the contents of the class. 그냥 positive하다만 서술하는것은 너무 광범위하고 repeating the year가 갑자기 나오니 무슨얘긴지 잘모르겠고, due to the poor concepts같은 표현은 뜻이불명확합니다. Moreover, group expectation will affect negatively on individual students. He thinks that it isn't an ideal way. These strongly rebuts the reading passage's assertion that repeating the year with particular grade would (should) be asked to students who do not finish minimum requirements.
|