▶ Your Answer :
Both the passage and the professor discuss whether home
schooling is truly appropriate for children’s education. While the passage
states that home schooling may place children at risk, the professor rebuts
that home schooling can be beneficial.
Firstly, the passage mentions that children may not be able
to cover important subjects, as well as ‘soft skills’ because parents do not
follow the standard curriculum. This might negatively affect children when they
take standardized tests. On the other hand, the professor claims that home
schooling not only covers necessary subjects, but also helps children to
succeed. According to the studies, home schooling children achieved scores
significantly higher than public school children by actively involving in their
studies. What’s more, home schooling children can choose their own subjects
that they are interested in; this helps children to acquire better
communication skills and be well rounded.
Secondly, the passage contends that children may experience
social risks because they encounter less people. Therefore, they may not gain
interaction and cooperation skills. Moreover, children who home school are
blind from realities of life, thus not prepared for difficulties. In contrast,
the professor argues that home schooling actually enhances social ability
instead of ruining it. Home schooling children come in contact with people from
different clubs, such as sports team and social clubs. Furthermore, home
schooling children are more responsible and mature because they spend most of
their time with top peers from college and adults. Moreover, a few studies has
shown that home schooling children are more resourceful and active.
|