The author and the lecturer both discuss the possibility of basic living beings’ existence on Mars. While the author believes that it’s very probable that some kind of life forms can exist on Mars, the lecturer casts doubt on the author’s opinion.
서론은 좋습니다.
According to the author, the existence of methane suggests that some basic life form might live there since methane gas is only emitted by living organisms. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this saying this is wrong. Methane gas also comes from volcanic activity and there are still a lot of active volcanoes emitting methane gas.
author에 주장을 먼저 이야기하면 안 됩니다. 반드시 lecturer가 주장한 내용을 먼저 언급하셔야만 합니다.
마지막에 lecturer의 주장에서 volcanoes 이야기만 했지, Mars에서 volcanoes가 활동하는지에 관련해서는 적지 않으셨습니다.
Another evidence the author points out is that there are meteorites from Mars that had some signs of bacteria. On the other hand, the lecturer counters this idea by suggesting the testing method is in its infant stages so the information given about the meteorites is very unclear. Also, he goes on to saying it is not even certain that those meteorites are from Mars.
정확하게 어떤 내용을 반박하는지 내용이 이해가 잘 안갑니다. 주장만 했고, 어떤 포인트에 반박인지 이해가 가지 않아요. bacteria가 문제면 bacteria로 가시고, 정확히 어떤 문제 때문에 반박이 되는건지 이해가 가지 않아요.
In response to reading’s assertion that that the existence of frozen on each side of Mar’s poles and the signs of flee-flowing water suggests that a living form exists on Mars, the lecturer argues that frozen water is not conducive to survival of a living being. Moreover, flee-flowing water underneath Mar’s surface is not verified and it could take years for scientists to find about what’s beneath Mar’s surface.
여긴 좀 이해가 가긴 갑니다. 그렇지만, lecturer에 포인트를 먼저 두라는 거 잊지 마세요.
To sum up, the lecturer counters the author’s belief about the existence of life by proving the uncertainty of the evidence given in the reading passage. |