From my perspective, I strongly disagree with this idea that businesses should hire people for their entire lives for the following reasons, in order to survive and increase efficiency.
First of all, the ultimate goal of corporations is to survive in competition.
Today’s society, the fad technology is pretty fast and changeable that it makes employers to have a lot of considerations.
The problem with this is that if the corporations could cannot follow technological issues right away, they are going to out of business.
Therefore, if they want to survive in the harsh competition, employers have to pick up the workers who are familiar were educated with brand new technologies that could not be learned to rather than those who are not. former workers.
For example, Samsung, that is the most famous corporation in South Korea, was used to produce the electric home appliances. However, overtime, they profited less from have less profit from electric home appliances because of cChina that has have expense of the cheapest labor charge. Therefore Samsung hired hires the a number of new experts (사람)expertise about cell phone and developed the field of mobile phone that made continuously makes them survive as one of the well-known company in the world.
Based on this example, companies have flexibility about enterprise and employment. *그과정에서 꽤 많은 사람들이 해고당했다는 말을 쓰면 더 탄탄한 argument가 될듯:)
In addition, it 문단시작할땐 대명사 쓰는 대신 한번 더 써주세요 ^^detracts the companies’ efficiency.
It is often said that corporations that want to succeed in their area have to go well with their employees and offer the family like working environment in order to increase cause developing productivity.
However, job stability makes employees feel bored and lose their not only their concentration but also responsibility.
So, for the security of company, employers have to give some pressure such as laying offs.
According to the study recently released by the Ministry of Labor of Korea show interesting result that company of offering family like working environment or guarantee of position has 46% business operation efficiency. However, the other company that has lay off system has 72% business operation efficiency.
Based on this study, a little pressure from company to employees elevates the company’s productivity.
As a result, hiring employees for their entire lives has have a lot of risks to company thus, I disagree with the topic sentencequestion. |