Many people debate on whether video games are harmful to children. The lecturer casts doubts
on the reading passage's argument that video games are harmful to children.
First of all, the lecturer argues that video games are not particularly addictive. Everything we enjoy is to a certain extent addiction addictive. The obsessive tendency is which children (who play) playing the vidoe games have is also shown in other aspects of their lives. Also, this tendency is the symptoms of other unrelated problems children have.
Therefore, the lecturer's arguments challenges the reading passage's argument that the video games is addictive and thus harmful to children.
On top of that, the lecturer claims that the video games do not lead children to violent crimes. The crimes rate, especially among young chileren, is currently the lowest in 30 years since the video games have come into our lives. The lecturer suggests that maybe the video games are preventing possible youth crimes, which completely rebuffs the claims made in the reading passage that the video games encourage aggressive tendencies among children.
Most of all, the lecturer makes a further argument that the video games actually have positive effects on children. The video games have interactive aspects that help its players solve problmes more quickly, multitask, guage risks, and make decisions speedily. Also, the video games improve their players' reaction time and spacial skills. These positive aspects the lecturer points out directly oppose the reading passage's argument that the video games are harmful to children.