Some people might say that reading a book twice is less interesting than reading only once since they remember what the book tells. However, I think reading a good book twice is more intresting than reading once. There are two reasons I can insist.
First, by reading twice, we can understand the author's thought better. In most good books the most important and the most interesting meaning is not that obvious to understand by reading just once. So in order to understand clearly what the author tells and in order to enjoy reading, reading twice is required. For example, Shakespears' books are difficult to understand and are required to be read more than twice. Also as soons as we realize what Shakespears insists, we pay more attantion and get interested more. If people have read his book only once, no one could have found his books interesting.
Moreover, a good book has multiple meanings that differ depending on the readers. This is also an interesting element that readers must find out. Some people might find this multiple meaning easily. However, for most readers it is difficult to figure out the different meanings at once. A Book that makes debates for what the author really insists make readers more interested. Readers who read the book twice and more have the opportunity to understand the basic information more and will be able to consider the multiple meanings. It has been well known that reading a book more and more is necessary to understand the book better.
To sum up, reading a good book twice is more interesting than reading only once since the book mostly contains better information that cannot be shown to the readers who only read once. A Good book also has multiple meanings that make readers think more and more. These are the most important elements to read a good book. So it is required to read twice in order to enjoy reading a good book. |