We are about to embark on a new era of innovative ideas and dynamic challenges. With the developed and extended technology in these days, a big chunk of population believe that other new energy sources which is renewable will replace the traditional those such as coal, gas and oil soon, but this litigous issue is still frequently talked about. Upon delving into which argument is more plausible in the future, I think that the former assertion is hard to be realized in the near future. With intensive consideration, numerous bases is are divulged to support my claim.
One very prevailing assertion is that with the current technology, using the natural sources of energy including sun, wind and water costs us to generate energy and maintain it. Actually, it has just stepped into the first stage and needs to be studied more for commercialized generally. When we use which kind of energy, since we should contemplate the side of economic, since it is very important factor. For example, one study by the Ministry of intelligence and economic in Korea showed that generating energy with the renewable sources cost ten times and more compared to the traditional method. Also, if we consider the disaster in Japan recently, they had used nuclear energy instead of other renewable energy sources in spite of the risk factors because they could not ignore this economic side.
An additional contention that caused me to favor this side is that the energy sources of new types are not as much effective as we imagine. It depends on surrounding of energy factory and there is a variety of limitations to use it completely. Greece is one of the contries countries which generates energy with sunshine. However, in fact, they need a secondary energy sources in case of cloudy days or night time.
After thinking about this issue, I have conclusively realized that it will continue to it is better to use of the traditional energy sources rather than replacing it with renewables. The important reason is due to not stable technology when using the renewable sources as aforementioned above.
전체적으로 무난한 글입니다~~
하지만 첫번째 바디와 두번째바디의 글자 수의 발렌스가 맞지 않습니다. 보통 바디 원이랑 투는 비슷한 수준으로 유지되어야 더 보기 좋습니다~
이럴땐 바디원의 부연 설명을 줄여주시거나 바디 투의 부연 설명을 늘려주세여~~
홧팅하세여~~!!!!