The reading passages contends that it is more benefitial to practice a fout-day workweek of thirty-two hours. On the other hand, the lecturer explains several poionts that contradict this argument.
First of all, the speaker states that employers should pay additional fees, which is so expensive, to workers, if they have extra stuff. This casts doubts on the reading passage which argues that the shorten-working-time practice allows imployer to pay less in salaries.
Second, according to the professor, by increasing working-time, this would helps workers to improve their talents related of their job. So, the a four-day workweek is not profitable. This rebuffs the reading which asserts that employee have more healthier life, because thay can enjoy sports or games with their family and friends. This effect would be so great.
The final points made by the lecturer is that, since working-time is lessned, the smaller income affects nagatively on national economy. Also, the lessened-time can cause the quality of work to be decreased. However, this refutes the reading passage’s argument that happy workers and shorten-working-time will helps to creat more jobs and to improve national economy. |