The reading passage claims that green roofs have many advantages. However, the proffsor of the listening passage disagrees about it and says that liveing roofs or green roofs aren't that benificial. First, the reading passage says that the green roofs are benificial because they can bulid a park on here.For example, Chicago's city hall used this idea to solve the problem. However, the listening passage says that this is not true. Because they can't enter the parking lot if the building is too high to go to the roof. Second, the reading passage says that the green roofs are benificial because people can enjoy the view. Growing trees, grass, and flowers on roof would be a great view. However, the listening passage says that this is not true. Because people usally walk on the side walk so they cannot see the nice view of the green roof. Lastly, the reading passage says that the green roofs are benificial because they offer substantial cost savings because they can save energy. For example, Chicago's city hall save $25,000 per year because of this. However, the listening passage says that this is not true. Because, they have too much additional cost to build such thing that it cost more that the savings that comes from the roof. According to this the reading passage claims that green roofs are benificial. However, the listening passage claims that green roofs don't have many advantages. |