jop이 아니고 job입니다 :)
In this set of materials, the writer and the lecture cover the issue of new business. The writer lists three evidences of the idea that the new business have many advantages. However, the lecturer claims that the businesses have disadvantage by matching rebuting evidences.
To begin with, while the reading passage argues that the policy reduce unemployment. (문장을 끝내시면 안되죠 :) The speaker actually points out that other local people can get the new jop. and also, if the business fails, new unemplyee unemployment will increase after all.
아무리 통합형이라도 body가 너무 짧네요. 문장내용또한 급하게 넘어가는 느낌이고 뜻이 clear하지 않습니다.
On top of that, the speaker casts doubt on the reading that the local business will improve because many people concentrate there. His main reason is that if the new jop appears , the people who get the jop will move the workplace. Therefore, the public facility will lack. Also, he states that these dyas, the govenment reduced the tax for the new business. so it is difficult to handle the problem.
일자리를 얻다라는 것을 get the job으로밖에 표현 못한다는 점 사람들이 몰린다라는것을 concentrate there라고 표현한다는 점 일자리를 옮기다를 move the workplace로 표현한 점, public facility will lack, 등은 lexical resource 면에서 좋은 점수 받을 수 없는 요인들입니다.
Futhermore, the spaker denies the reading which maintains that the new business will provide the community with high salery and employee ? by saying that the just only supervisors or manages make a good living, and the average people don't make a lot of money.
For these reasons, the speaker challenges the reading's point.
|