The reading passage argues that the nuclear power energy is beneficial to human.
However, the professor asserts that the reading passage's claim can be wrong by listing rebutting proofs.
To begin with, the reading passage claims that the nuclear energy is more economical than fosssil fuels. However, the lecturer argues that it is required to huge cost to use the nuclear energy system until the system generates a energy to cover with the cost of the system's construction. In other words,
On top of that, the passage contends that the nuclear energy system can be helpful to solve the environmental problems of the fossil fuels. On the contrary, the professor states the opposite position to the reading passage's assertion. He argues that the nuclear power also cause a environment to be in danger. This is because that the process of the nuclear power's generation heats a much water, and this is harmful to the ecosystem.
Lastly, the reading passage asserts that the the emission of nuclear power can be easily controlled and the nuclear power is less hazardous than the coal burning. On the other hand, the professor completely rebuts the reading passge's point. He says that the nuclear power also gives negative effects to people's health according as the nuclear power's emission degree. For example, the radioactive waves of the nuclear power can cause a cancer.
|