According to the reading passage, it argues that the advertisement of medical drugs is beneficial to patients. However, the professor contends that the reading passage's claim can be wrong by listing rebutting proofs.
To begin with, the reading passage claims that the drug advertisement helps the patients to offer informations. So, the patients could know how they can treat their illness. However, the professor rebuts the reading passage's point. He says that it could offer a imprecise prescription the patients.
On top of that, the reading passage asserts that the drug advertisement replaces a doctor's prescription to the patient's self-treatment. On the other hand, the professor states the opposite to the reading passage's position. He says that the self-direction abot medicine can be hazardous to the patients, which is proven by the research.
Lastly, the passage argues that the drug advertisement allows the patients to know the medical developments and efficient medical treatment. On the contrary, the professor object the passage's assertion. He says that the advertised drugs are not always the best because the drugs can be exaggerated through the advertisement. Also, it gives the special gift in order to convince their consumer. |