▶ Your Answer :
The professor contradicts the reading passage’s assertion reading’s passage that hydrogen energy is does not pass 1. test.
1. 테스트가 무엇인지 밝혀주면 좋겠습니다. 안정성 테스트와 같이 구체적으로 써주시면 더 명확한 글이 될 수 있습니다.
Firstly, the lecturer asserts that hydrogen energy costs higher than gasoline energy. Hydrogen energy should be used with electro electric energy. This assertion directly contradicts the reading’s claim that hydrogen energy would be much economical than nonrenewable fossil fuels.
Secondly, the lecturer explains that hydrogen energy is not easy to store. The liquid form of hydrogen energy is volatile and it is also difficult to generate energy (make the making process is a difficult task). Also, the weather is not feasible for making the hydrogen energy all the time. This explanation directly refutes the reading’s argument that hydrogen energy is eco-friendly (and environmentally friendly).
Thirdly, the lecturer insists that store the storage of hydrogen energy is not easy because the 1. form of storing the energy is quite heavy. This insistence directly contradicts the reading’s claim that the hydrogen energy is effortless to keep and transport.
1. Form of storing the energy 가 무엇인가요? 에너지 저장 도구의 하나인가요? Form 대신에 다른 term 을 사용하면 더 좋을 것 같네요.
In conclusion, the listening passage states that (->결론은 쓰지 않으셔도 됩니다. ) |